The quarter missed a recovery that investors were expecting. Published expectations called for roughly $194.6 million of revenue, about $(0.13) of EPS, and a same-store sales decline near 4.2%; Sweetgreen delivered $192.7 million, $(0.22) of EPS, and a 6.2% decline. The revenue miss was modest, but the sales trend and earnings shortfall were more consequential because the market was looking for evidence that the turnaround was gaining traction.
| Metric | Q2 FY2026 | Q2 FY2025 | Versus expectation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $192.7 million (Income Statement) | $185.6 million (Income Statement) | Below published ~$194.6 million consensus |
| Same-store sales change | (6.2)% (Key Performance Indicators) | (7.6)% (Key Performance Indicators) | Worse than published ~4.2% decline expectation |
| Net loss per share | $(0.22) (Income Statement) | $(0.20) (Income Statement) | Below published roughly $(0.13) consensus |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $(0.2) million (Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation) | $6.4 million (Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation) | Profitability deteriorated |
| Restaurant-Level Profit Margin | 13.1% (Restaurant-Level Profit reconciliation) | 18.9% (Restaurant-Level Profit reconciliation) | Down roughly 600 basis points |
| Operating cash flow | $(17.6) million (Cash Flow statement) | $(2.7) million (Cash Flow statement) | Cash burn worsened |
The core restaurant economics deteriorated despite modest reported revenue growth. Revenue rose 3.8%, but that growth came mainly from 36 newer restaurants; comparable-restaurant revenue fell $11.2 million, with traffic down 2.0% and product mix down 4.2% (Financial Highlights). Restaurant operating costs rose to 86.9% of revenue from 81.1%, as ingredient usage, higher portions, promotions, labor, and other operating costs absorbed the sales base (Income Statement). That pushed Restaurant-Level Profit down to $25.2 million from $35.1 million (Restaurant-Level Profit reconciliation), while Adjusted EBITDA swung to a $0.2 million loss from $6.4 million (Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation).
The updated outlook is a fresh negative because it removes visibility just as the recovery was supposed to be showing up. Management attributed the change to reduced demand following a multistate cyclosporiasis outbreak beginning in mid-July and said the timing of recovery is uncertain (Outlook). The filing does not provide the revised numerical targets in the supplied text, so the size of the guidance reduction cannot be quantified; however, replacing a defined recovery path with uncertainty is worse than the prior expectation of improving same-store sales, restaurant margins, and positive full-year Adjusted EBITDA.
The headline profit and balance-sheet improvement are not operating gains. Year-to-date net income of $99.5 million is almost entirely driven by a $160.6 million gain on the Spyce disposal, alongside $100.0 million of cash proceeds and $86.4 million of preferred stock received as consideration (Income Statement; Cash Flow statement; Balance Sheet). Excluding that transaction, the business remained loss-making and used $17.6 million in operating cash during the first half (Cash Flow statement). Cash and equivalents increased to $142.6 million from $89.2 million, but the improvement is primarily transaction-funded rather than the result of healthier restaurant operations (Balance Sheet).
Net read: the filing is materially worse than the market’s hoped-for stabilization. New restaurants and lower corporate costs helped reported revenue and expenses, but they did not offset weaker same-store demand, sharply lower restaurant profitability, negative Adjusted EBITDA, and worsening cash burn. The food-safety disruption may be temporary, yet the filing leaves the key question—when comparable sales and margins recover—less answerable than before.
Read the original 8-K on SEC EDGAR ↗