AllSight
Companies · PHM · Operative Builders · Earnings · Jul 22, 2026

EPS beat expectations, but margin compression keeps the quarter mixed

Beatnew
Diluted EPS $2.48 vs ~$2.36 consensus
PULTEGROUP INC/MI/ (PHM) — what happened, in plain English, and what it means versus what the market expected.

The quarter cleared a lowered bar. Published consensus was roughly $2.36 for diluted EPS and $3.94 billion of revenue; PulteGroup delivered $2.48 and $3.98 billion, respectively, making this an earnings beat rather than merely a record-looking comparison.

MetricQ2 2026Q2 2025Market reference
Diluted EPS$2.48 (Financial Highlights)$3.03 (Financial Highlights)~$2.36 consensus
Total revenue$3.98B (Income Statement)$4.40B (Income Statement)~$3.94B consensus
Home sale revenue$3.81B (Financial Highlights)$4.27B (Financial Highlights)—
Home closings6,997 (Operating statistics)7,639 (Operating statistics)—
Average selling price$544,000 (Operating statistics)$559,000 (Operating statistics)—
Homebuilding gross margin25.0% (Operating statistics)27.0% (Operating statistics)—
Net new orders7,536 homes (Operating statistics)7,083 homes (Operating statistics)—
Backlog10,966 homes / $6.80B (Operating statistics)10,779 homes / $6.84B (Operating statistics)—

The beat came despite a weaker operating base. Revenue fell 10% year over year as closings dropped 8% and average selling price declined 3% (Operating statistics). Net income fell 22% and diluted EPS fell 18% versus last year (Financial Highlights), so the headline beat reflects performance above current expectations—not underlying year-over-year growth.

Demand improved, but mostly through a larger footprint. Net new orders rose 6% to 7,536 homes, while order dollars increased 5% to $4.1 billion (Operating statistics). The release says higher community count helped drive the gain; absorption pace declined 1% on the company’s subsequent earnings discussion. Backlog units increased 2%, but backlog value slipped 1%, showing that volume has not translated into higher pricing power.

Margins remain the key giveback. Homebuilding gross margin improved 60 basis points sequentially to 25.0%, but remained 200 basis points below the prior year; SG&A rose to 10.1% of home sale revenue from 9.1% (Operating statistics). That offsets much of the encouraging order trend and explains why the net result is only a narrow beat rather than a broad operational outperformance.

Capital returns were supportive, but cash conversion weakened. The company repurchased $681 million of stock through six months and raised the quarterly dividend to $0.26 from $0.22 (Financial Highlights; Cash Flow statement). However, operating cash flow fell to $177 million from $422 million as inventory absorbed $807 million, while net debt moved to $443 million from net cash of $378 million at year-end (Cash Flow statement; Debt-to-Capital Ratios). Net: better than consensus on the income statement, with improving orders but still-visible pricing, margin, and cash-investment pressure.

Read the original 8-K on SEC EDGAR ↗
More from PULTEGROUP INC/MI/ (PHM)
Aug 12, 2026JPMorgan is out; Pulte Mortgage now has a five-bank $625M funding lineAll PHM filings, decoded →
Related companies in Operative Builders
Latest across the market
ACNAccenture earnings beat as Q4 revenue clears guidance, but FY27 growth stays measuredROPRoper Technologies adds NTT DATA CEO to board, but brings no operating changeIIPRIIPR loan increase funds Alewife buildout, but locks in 14% debtGLUEMonte Rosa GFORCE-1 results clear safety bar, but ASCVD Phase 2 moves to 2027SMASmartStop dividend holds at $1.60 annualized as October payout repeats patternHBNCHorizon Bancorp schedules Q3 earnings, offering no fresh business readBrowse all companies, decoded →
Open live on AllSight — the whole market, decoded →
AllSight turns SEC filings into plain-English, neutral reads and objective market context. We explain what happened and how it lands versus expectations — we do not give investment advice or predict prices. Decoded straight from the filing; check it against the source.
Analysis by AllSight · Editorial standards & method · Contact